Daniel Hume's Victims Confront Trauma as Convicted Paedophile Dies Under VAD Scheme

In a deeply disturbing incident that has reignited debates over the voluntary assisted dying (VAD) scheme in New South Wales, two of Daniel Hume’s victims found themselves in a family photo at his deathbed—without their consent. Hume, a convicted paedophile serving a 30-year sentence for sexually abusing multiple children, died on August 28, 2025, under the VAD scheme. The photograph, taken during the period when the girls were being sexually abused by Hume, was brought to Cessnock Hospital by his mother and not screened by hospital staff.

Neveah Jett, one of the victims in the photo and now 27, expressed profound outrage at the situation. She said the act made her feel 'sick' that Hume was allowed to view her during his final days. 'It was outrageous that Hume was given the opportunity to walk around the hospital grounds before his death and that he did not die as a prisoner,' she stated.

The incident has sparked a broader conversation about the rights of victims and the ethical implications of the VAD scheme. Gary McCahon, Commissioner of Corrective Services NSW, acknowledged the trauma caused to the victims and apologised for any wrongdoing by staff, stating that those responsible would be held accountable. However, Jett is now advocating for reform of the VAD scheme, arguing that the 14 other victims of Hume should have been consulted about his application.

Brett Collins, a prison advocate, weighed in, stating that victims' rights do not extend to allowing offenders to experience additional pain and suffering. He warned that allowing such actions could be seen as supporting torture. 'This is not about the rights of the offender, but about the rights of the victims,' he said.

Hume was the first prisoner in NSW to die under the VAD scheme, and Jett is deeply disappointed that he was allowed to access medical suicide after serving only seven years of his sentence. 'No one informed me of the plan, and it felt like a kick in the stomach,' she said, expressing her frustration and betrayal.

As the debate over the VAD scheme continues, the voices of victims like Jett are calling for a re-evaluation of how such decisions are made, emphasizing the need for victim consultation and the protection of their emotional well-being.