Keywords: New Zealand, attempted espionage, military detention, far-right groups, The Dominion Movement, national security, legal case, espionage charges, counter-radicalization, military intelligence
Back to News List
Friday, 22 August 2025

A Former New Zealand Soldier Convicted of Attempted Espionage

In a landmark case that has raised significant concerns about national security, a former New Zealand soldier has been convicted of attempted espionage and sentenced to two years in military detention. This marks the first time in New Zealand’s history that a serving soldier has been found guilty of such a serious offense.


The individual, whose identity has been withheld by the court, pleaded guilty to three charges: attempted espionage, dishonestly accessing a computer system, and possessing an objectionable publication. The soldier had previously been linked to far-right groups and was the founder of a far-right organization known as 'The Dominion Movement,' which was established before the 15 March 2019 terror attacks in Christchurch.


According to court documents, the soldier made contact with a third party, expressing an interest in defecting. This led to an undercover officer, posing as a foreign agent, reaching out to the individual. During the course of their communication, the soldier provided sensitive information that included maps, aerial photographs, access codes, and assessments of the vulnerabilities of Linton Military Camp.


The soldier was arrested in 2019 and initially faced 17 charges. However, after a plea deal was reached, he received a two-year sentence in military detention. Legal experts have noted that while espionage is a rare occurrence in New Zealand, the country still holds valuable military and intelligence assets that could be of interest to foreign powers.


This case has sparked a broader discussion about the potential risks posed by extremist ideologies within the military and the need for enhanced vetting processes and counter-radicalization efforts. Some legal analysts have suggested that the sentence, while severe, may be seen as a deterrent to others who might consider similar actions.


As the trial has concluded, the case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of vigilance in safeguarding national security, particularly in the context of evolving threats and the influence of extremist groups within various sectors of society.

0.045256s