New Zealand Foreign Minister Expresses Regret Over Diplomatic Protocol Breach Involving Deputy Prime Minister
New Zealand Foreign Minister Expresses Regret Over Diplomatic Protocol Breach Involving Deputy Prime Minister
New Zealand's Foreign Minister, Winston Peters, has expressed his “regret” over a recent diplomatic incident involving Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour, who sent a letter to a top United Nations official that reportedly breached protocol.
The letter, which was published by a local media outlet, criticized Albert K. Barume, the United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, for intervening in New Zealand’s domestic policy, particularly the Regulatory Standards Bill, which is overseen by Seymour.
In response, both Peters and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon stated that Seymour should not have addressed Barume directly and that the matter should have been handled by Peters on behalf of the government. Seymour later formally withdrew his letter.
Peters sent the government’s official response to Barume on August 5, stating that the letter had not been directly received by Barume but had instead come to light through media reports. He expressed deep regret over the breakdown in protocol and emphasized the opportunity to clarify the situation.
It remains unclear why Seymour’s letter did not reach Barume, as it was sent to the address provided in Barume’s original letter. Peters clarified that he understood Barume’s letter to the government did not represent the views of the UN or himself, but rather sought the government’s response to concerns raised by others.
The government’s letter to Barume outlines its position on the Regulatory Standards Bill and the Treaty settlement process, emphasizing the government’s commitment to improving outcomes for all New Zealanders. It also highlights a focus on achieving targets in health, education, law and order, work, and housing, as well as providing public services to all New Zealanders, including collaboration with iwi (tribes) and Māori to accelerate Māori economic growth and enable targeted investment in Māori social development.
It was understood that Seymour was consulted on the new letter. According to reports, he wanted the contents of his original letter to be included again in Peters’ response. However, Seymour did not see the final version of the letter before it was sent, which did not include any of his earlier remarks.
Peters appended three detailed sections to his letter. One of these sections outlined New Zealand’s relevant constitutional arrangements, including a discussion on MMP (Mixed Member Proportional) and the realities of coalition government. It also detailed the status of the Māori seats, the Bill of Rights Act, and the Waitangi Tribunal.
This incident highlights the importance of diplomatic protocol in international relations and underscores the need for clear communication between government officials and international bodies. While the situation has been resolved, it serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between domestic policy and international engagement.