Erin Patterson's Police Interview About Deadly Mushroom Lunch Released by Court

Keywords: Erin Patterson, triple murder, death cap mushrooms, police interview, court case, dehydrator, cover-up, family conflict, legal trial, food contamination
Back to News List
Saturday, 09 August 2025

Erin Patterson's Police Interview About Deadly Mushroom Lunch Released by Court

Erin Patterson, the woman at the center of a shocking triple murder case involving a deadly mushroom-laced beef Wellington, has had her police interview released by the court. The interview, which took place days after the incident, reveals details of her actions and mindset following the tragic deaths of her in-laws.

Accidental Contamination or Premeditated Crime?

During the interview, Patterson claimed that she had not consumed the death cap mushrooms herself and that her symptoms were not consistent with those of the other guests. She explained that she had visited Leongatha Hospital two days after the lunch, initially believing she only needed saline due to dehydration. However, she left the hospital against medical advice, citing the need to care for her animals and prepare her daughter for activities.

Patterson also denied owning a dehydrator, despite a manual for a Sunbeam Food Lab electronic dehydrator being found in her home. This discrepancy has raised questions about her honesty, especially after the dehydrator was later discovered at a local tip with death cap mushroom residue.

A Facade of Love and Hidden Resentment

Prosecutors have alleged that Patterson maintained a facade of a loving daughter-in-law while privately mocking and disparaging her relatives in Facebook messages. These messages, shown in court, painted a picture of growing anger and resentment toward her in-laws. While no specific motive was outlined, the jury was told that Patterson's emotions had been building over time.

During the trial, Patterson claimed that her lies were fueled by innocent panic in the aftermath of the accidental contamination of the meal. However, the prosecution argued that she had engaged in a series of lies to cover up her tracks after the murders.

The Aftermath and Guilty Verdict

The court heard that Patterson had attempted to cover her tracks by lying about the source of the mushrooms, claiming she had purchased them from an Asian grocer. However, no such grocer existed, and the dehydrator found at the tip with mushroom residue cast further doubt on her story.

After a week of deliberation, the jury returned a guilty verdict, finding Patterson responsible for the deaths of her in-laws. The case has sparked widespread discussion about the tragic consequences of accidental contamination and the lengths to which individuals may go to cover up their actions.

Podcast and Further Updates

The ABC has launched a podcast covering the key updates from Erin Patterson's trial, providing listeners with in-depth coverage of the case. This follows the court's release of the police interview, which has added new layers to the ongoing investigation.

As the trial continues, the public remains closely following the developments in this high-profile case, which has raised important questions about food safety, mental health, and the legal system's response to such tragedies.