NRL Star Josh Papalii's Court Case Delayed Over Alleged Police Use of Encrypted Messaging App Signal

Canberra, August 4, 2025 — A high-profile legal case involving former Canberra Raiders player Josh Papalii has been delayed, with his legal team alleging that police involved in the investigation may have used the encrypted messaging app Signal to discuss the matter. The delay has raised significant questions about the use of encrypted communication tools in criminal proceedings and the transparency of police protocols.

Josh Papalii, a veteran of the National Rugby League (NRL), is accused of throwing glasses at staff and threatening police at the Raiders Club in Gungahlin, Canberra, in September 2024. He has pleaded not guilty to three charges, including resisting police, and was due to face a three-day hearing in the ACT Magistrates Court. However, the case has now been adjourned until August 18, when new hearing dates are expected to be set.

Papalii's legal team argued that the use of Signal by law enforcement officers in the case could have compromised the integrity of the investigation. They pointed out that in other jurisdictions, the use of encrypted messaging apps by police is strictly prohibited. However, it is not clear whether such a policy exists in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT).

Legal representatives for Papalii requested that the contents of the Signal messages be disclosed to the court, along with details about whether any messages had been deleted. They also sought clarification on the protocols governing the use of encrypted communications by police during criminal investigations.

Papalii appeared in court today with the support of senior club members, including Raiders CEO Don Furner. However, the hearing was delayed after his lawyers argued for an adjournment, citing the discovery of the alleged Signal communications. They also claimed that prosecutors had only recently informed them of an additional witness they intended to call, which they said was not sufficient time to prepare.

Magistrate Glenn Theakston expressed regret over the adjournment, citing the limitations on court resources. He acknowledged the complexity of the situation and the need for further clarification before proceeding with the case.

The revelation has sparked a broader debate about the use of encrypted communication tools by law enforcement. Critics argue that such tools can hinder transparency and accountability, especially in high-profile cases involving public figures. Others question whether the use of Signal by police in the ACT is in line with legal and ethical standards.

ACT Policing has not commented on the matter, as it is currently under judicial review. The case will now return to court on August 18, where further details are expected to be revealed.

As the legal battle continues, the outcome of this case could set a precedent for future use of encrypted communication by law enforcement in the ACT and potentially influence policy changes at the national level.