Dropkicks? Shouldn’t we make it easier for people to vote? – Editorial

On July 26, 2025, the New Zealand government announced a controversial change to electoral laws, halting same-day voter enrolment in general elections. This move, described by Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith as a “significant, but necessary change,” aims to reduce the strain on the electoral system caused by the rising number of special votes. However, critics argue that the decision undermines democratic principles and may disproportionately affect marginalized communities.

The proposed change would prevent voters from enrolling on election day, with the deadline moved to 13 days before the election. Same-day enrolments are currently counted as special votes, which take significantly longer to process than ordinary votes. According to the Electoral Commission, there were approximately 602,000 special votes cast in the last election, with projections of over 739,000 in the 2026 election.

Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour, who has referred to same-day voters as “dropkicks,” has faced criticism for his dismissive attitude toward those who choose to vote on election day. His remarks have been seen as out of touch with the reality that many New Zealanders—particularly from Māori, Pacific, and Asian communities, as well as younger voters—rely on same-day enrolment to participate in the democratic process.

The Electoral Commission has warned that the change could lead to a decrease in voter turnout and that special votes are more likely to come from communities already underrepresented in political processes. Labour leader Chris Hipkins described the proposed changes as “draconian” and anti-democratic, suggesting that any law restricting voting rights should require a supermajority in Parliament.

While the government argues that the change is necessary to streamline the electoral process, critics argue that it fails to address the root causes of low voter engagement and instead penalizes those who are most committed to participating. The debate over electoral reform is not just a matter of policy—it is a reflection of the values that underpin New Zealand’s democracy.

As the nation prepares for the next election, the conversation around accessibility, fairness, and the right to vote will remain central to the political discourse. Whether the government’s proposed changes will be seen as a step forward or a regression will depend on how well they balance efficiency with inclusivity.